Rate the Article: Comparison between Sutured and Sutureless Pressure Technique of Conjunctival Limbal Autograft in Pterygium Surgery, IJSR, Call for Papers, Online Journal
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)

International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Call for Papers | Fully Refereed | Open Access | Double Blind Peer Reviewed

ISSN: 2319-7064

Downloads: 106 | Views: 466

Comparative Studies | Medical Surgical | India | Volume 6 Issue 2, February 2017 | Rating: 6.6 / 10


Comparison between Sutured and Sutureless Pressure Technique of Conjunctival Limbal Autograft in Pterygium Surgery

Dr. R. R. Naik, Dr. Nitish Arora, Dr. Sneha Murade


Abstract: Aim - To compare the outcome of sutured and sutureless pressure technique of conjunctival limbal autograft in Pterygium surgery. Methods - Clinical trial was carried out in 24 patients with primary pterygium grade 2. Group A (12 patients) - Autograft with 10-0 ethilon sutures. Group B (12 patients) - Sutureless autograft placed in-situ with pressure technique. Condition of graft and patients discomfort assessed using visual analogue scale on post operative day 1. Results - No significant difference in post operative discomfort was found between 2 groups in both the techniques. (P<0.01) 4 out of 12 in sutureless pressure technique graft were displaced post operatively. All grafts in-situ in sutured graft technique. Conclusion - Technique with sutures is better than the sutureless pressure technique, though post operative discomfort is not significantly different.


Keywords: Pterygium, Conjunctival limbal autograft, sutureless autograft, sutured autograft


Edition: Volume 6 Issue 2, February 2017,


Pages: 1254 - 1255



Rate this Article


Select Rating (Lowest: 1, Highest: 10)

5

Your Comments (Only high quality comments will be accepted.)

Characters: 0

Your Full Name:


Your Valid Email Address:


Verification Code will appear in 2 Seconds ... Wait

Top