Downloads: 98 | Views: 331
Comparative Studies | Medical Surgical | India | Volume 9 Issue 5, May 2020 | Popularity: 6.7 / 10
A Comparative Evaluation of Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam-fentanyl for Sedation in Vitreoretinal Surgery under Peribulbar Anaesthesia
Dr. Ramakant Sharma, Dr. Alaka Purohit
Abstract: Introduction: Midazolam fentanyl (MDZ: FEN) combination is frequently used for intravenous sedation in ophthalmic surgeries in adults. Dexmedetomidine (DEX), is also indicated for procedural sedation. However, it may cause deeper sedation and patient non-coperation at recommended doses. Aims and objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low dose of i. v. dexmedetomidine (DEX) (0.25 microgm/kg) versus i. v midazolam-fentanyl (MDZ: FEN) (0.5mg/25microgm) for vitreoretinal surgeries under peribular anesthesia in adults. Materials and methods: In a randomized, double-blind, interventional study, 60 patients (30 each group) aged 20-60 years, scheduled for vitreoretinal surgery under peribulbar block were divided equally to receive either iv MDZ: FEN (0.5mg/25microgm) or iv DEX (0.25 microgm/kg) dose over 10 mins. The vital parameters, ramsay sedation score (RSS), surgeon satisfaction score & effect on respiration were noted. Results: The ‘DEX’ group patients had stable haemodynamics, level 3 sedation and surgeon satisfaction score of 2–3 (good to excellent operating conditions) with no respiratory depression. The sedation score (RSS) of 3 was achieved at approx 5.3 minutes in MDZ: FEN group as compared to 11.5 minutes in DEX group (p< 0.001). The intraoperative mean blood pressure was significant higher in MDZ: FEN group at 30 to 75 minutes (p<0.001). The post-operative nausea/vomiting was seen in 20 percent patients in MDZ: FEN group (p<0.023) and none in low dose DEX group which was statistically significant. Conclusion: Low dose inj. DEX (0.25microgm/kg) is an effective alternative to inj MDZ: FEN (0.5mg/25microgm) and provides better (level 3) sedation score and stable haemodynamics, surgeon satisfaction and no post‑operative nausea/vomitting. Hence both drugs are efficacious but low dose DEX is better than MDZ: FEN in the study.
Keywords: vitreoretinal, ophthalmic, dexmedetomidine, peribulbar-block, monitored anaesthesia care MAC
Edition: Volume 9 Issue 5, May 2020
Pages: 1615 - 1621
Make Sure to Disable the Pop-Up Blocker of Web Browser
Downloads: 277 | Views: 526
Medical Surgical, India, Volume 9 Issue 1, January 2020
Pages: 118 - 120Study of Efficacy and Success Rate of Single Dose Oral Mifepristone and Vaginal Misoprostol vs Vaginal Misoprostol alone for Second Trimester Termination of Pregnancy
Dr. Himani, Dr. Prakeerti Verma, Dr.Sreeramya Vedam, Dr. Kishor Chauhan
Downloads: 271 | Views: 567
Medical Surgical, India, Volume 8 Issue 2, February 2019
Pages: 31 - 34Assess the Attitude of the Women towards Home Visiting by Nursing Students in Selected Rural Community Area
Sonia Rani, Paramjit Kaur
Downloads: 235 | Views: 552
Medical Surgical, India, Volume 8 Issue 5, May 2019
Pages: 32 - 34A Review on Ethical Consideration in Surgical Procedures in Ayurveda
Dr. Leena Dhanendra, Dr Anil Kumar
Downloads: 228 | Views: 517
Medical Surgical, India, Volume 9 Issue 2, February 2020
Pages: 10 - 10Atypical Presentation of Viral Pneumonia (H1N1) as Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Case Report
Dr Kallepalli Divya, Dr P. Veeranjaneyulu
Downloads: 221 | Views: 511
Medical Surgical, India, Volume 7 Issue 11, November 2018
Pages: 14 - 16A Comparative Study of the Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Esmolol Infusion on Haemodynamic Parameters and Surgical Condition during Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
Dr Shivakumara K.C., Dr Veeresh, Dr. Lulu Sherif