Downloads: 2 | Views: 201 | Weekly Hits: ⮙2 | Monthly Hits: ⮙2
Analysis Study Research Paper | Dentistry | Egypt | Volume 11 Issue 4, April 2022 | Popularity: 5.2 / 10
Microleakage of Different Restorative Materials in Class V Restorations: In-Vitro Study
Mohamed Abuzaid, Hamdi Hamama
Abstract: Microleakage is a major factor contributing in the occurrence of secondary carious lesions around restorations. This study aimed to evaluate the microleakage around class V restorations using different restorative materials. In this in vitro study, 32 standardized class V cavities were prepared on buccal and lingual surfaces of 16 human teeth (extracted within a period of 6 months) using bevelled conventional preparation, where occlusal margin was located at the enamel and cervical margin at the cementum/dentin level. Specimens were randomly divided into 4 groups (N= 8) for restoration with (A) GC Fuji II LC (Resin modified glass ionomer) (B) Prime&Bond universal + SDR plus (Smart dentin replacement) (C) FuturaU Bond + Admira Fusion Flow (Ormocer-based nanohybrid flowable composite) (D) Palfique universal bond + Palfique universal flow. After being stored in distilled water and finished, teeth were immersed for 24 hours in 2% methylene blue dye. Teeth were sectioned bucco-lingually and dye penetration on occlusal and cervical margins was scored using a stereomicroscope. The results were analyzed using Chi square test and Kruskal-wallis test (? = 0.05). There was statistical significant difference between microleakage at occlusal margin and at the cervical margin (p < 0.001). None of the four different groups of restorative materials completely sealed the tooth/restoration interface at the cervical margin showing no statistical significant difference in microleakage (p = 0.054), while there was a statistical significant difference between the different materials at the occlusal margin (p = 0.024). When comparing different restorative materials in Class V cavities, the cervical margins, where adhesion is between restorative material and dentin/cementum, showed the greatest scores in microleakage (1).
Keywords: Flowable composite, microleakage, resin modified glass ionomer, class V restorations
Edition: Volume 11 Issue 4, April 2022
Pages: 720 - 724
DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.21275/SR22411084020
Make Sure to Disable the Pop-Up Blocker of Web Browser
Similar Articles
Downloads: 1 | Weekly Hits: ⮙1 | Monthly Hits: ⮙1
Review Papers, Dentistry, Bulgaria, Volume 12 Issue 9, September 2023
Pages: 662 - 664Enhancing Endodontic Success: Exploring Laser-Based Techniques for Root Canal Therapy Improvement
Violeta Dogandziyska
Downloads: 2 | Weekly Hits: ⮙1 | Monthly Hits: ⮙1
Research Paper, Dentistry, Bulgaria, Volume 11 Issue 4, April 2022
Pages: 241 - 244Laser Application and Root Canal Sealing of Endodontically Treated Teeth
Violeta Dogandziyska, Emilia Karova
Downloads: 2 | Weekly Hits: ⮙1 | Monthly Hits: ⮙1
Case Studies, Dentistry, India, Volume 13 Issue 3, March 2024
Pages: 1194 - 1198The Injection Resin Technique - A Minimally Invasive Concept for Aesthetic Restoration: A Case Report
Dr. M. B Wavdhane, Dr. Pradnya V. Bansode, Dr. Seema D. Pathak, Dr. Aishwarya Jadhav
Downloads: 4 | Weekly Hits: ⮙1 | Monthly Hits: ⮙4
Research Paper, Dentistry, India, Volume 13 Issue 1, January 2024
Pages: 1734 - 1739Comparison of Compressive Strength and Microleakage of Zirconia Reinforced Flowable Composite and Zirconia Reinforced GIC in Class V Cavities - An In-Vitro Study
Dr. L Krishna Prasada, Dr Gunjan Chawla
Downloads: 5 | Weekly Hits: ⮙1 | Monthly Hits: ⮙2
Comparative Studies, Dentistry, India, Volume 13 Issue 1, January 2024
Pages: 467 - 470To Evaluate and Compare the Antibacterial Efficacy of Two Sealing Agents at the Implant - Abutment Interface - An In-Vitro Study
Dr. Bhavyashree R, Dr. Jnanadev K R