Downloads: 125 | Views: 470 | Weekly Hits: ⮙1 | Monthly Hits: ⮙1
Research Paper | Medicine Science | Egypt | Volume 4 Issue 12, December 2015 | Popularity: 6.9 / 10
Effect of Cantileverd Bar Length on Strain Around Two and Four-Implants Supporting A Mandibular Over-Denture
Mohamed Sherine El Attar, Faten Salah El Din, Jailan Salem
Abstract: Statement of problem There is little information as to how the cantilevered bar length affect the strain around two and four implants supporting a mandibular over denture Purpose measure the effect of cantilevered bar length on strain produced around two-implant and four-implant supporting a mandibular over denture, and evaluating the amount of stress reaching the supporting structures. Materials and methods Two root-form implants were placed bilaterally in the canine region of an edentulous acrylic mandibular model (group A). Also four root-form implants were placed in the canine & bicuspid region of another edentulous acrylic mandibular model (group B). The implants on each model were connected with a resilient bar/clip attachment with the following lengths of cantilevered bar length 11mm, 9mm and 7mm. Four linear strain gauges were bonded to the acrylic resin at the mesial & distal surface of each implant. Each gauge was wired separately into a 1/4 Wheatstone bridge of a multichannel digital bridge amplifier. Strains were measured on each model. Strain measurements were performed under central loading using a loading device. Results when using two or four implants, the 11mm cantilevered bar length generated the highest peri-implant strain values, while the 7mm cantilever length recorded the lowest under central loading conditions. A positive correlation between the cantilever length and the peri-implant strain was found. The same effect was found on the supporting structures. Conclusion The 7mm cantilevered bar with clips placed on the cantilevers was recommended when 2 or 4 implants were used to support mandibular over dentures as it demonstrated the lowest magnitude of strains with no significant differences between peri-implant sites
Keywords: Cantilever, bar, strain, implant, over denture
Edition: Volume 4 Issue 12, December 2015
Pages: 27 - 33
DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.21275/NOV151749
Make Sure to Disable the Pop-Up Blocker of Web Browser
Similar Articles
Downloads: 93
Research Paper, Medicine Science, Albania, Volume 9 Issue 11, November 2020
Pages: 108 - 115Correction of Simptomatic Flexible Flatfoot - A Review
Edvin Selmani, Vilson Ruci
Downloads: 98
Research Paper, Medicine Science, Poland, Volume 4 Issue 12, December 2015
Pages: 1140 - 1144Functional Disorders of Heart Stimulating Systems in Patients Treated with Radiation Therapy ? Own Experiences
Ewa Zikowska, Tomasz Winiewski, Mieszko Biaas
Downloads: 105
Research Paper, Medicine Science, Egypt, Volume 5 Issue 5, May 2016
Pages: 2252 - 2259Influence of Screw Access Channel on All Ceramic Cement-Retained Implant Supported Posterior Crowns
Amr El-Sayed Khalifa, Dawlat Mostafa, Mohamed Moataz M. Khamis
Downloads: 111
Research Paper, Medicine Science, India, Volume 3 Issue 3, March 2014
Pages: 584 - 590Knowledge of Contraceptives Methods and Appraisal of Health Education among Married Woman
Shabana Anjum, P. M. Durgawale, Mahadeo Shinde
Downloads: 111
Review Papers, Medicine Science, India, Volume 6 Issue 1, January 2017
Pages: 2213 - 2217Periimplantitis: A Review
Bhagyashri Gudadhe, Deepti Gattani, Sakshi Dubey, Sneha Meshram, Akhilesh Shewale, Shweta Patnaik